Disposed

FPA-PMLA-2449/CHD/2018 of Yogendra Pratap Singh v/s Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh

ATFP7 Jan 2019FPA-PMLA-2449/CHD/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeals filed under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act against impugned orders. The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing. It was informed that possession of certain properties was taken by the Respondent under Section 8(4). The Court ordered maintenance of status quo for remaining properties.

What did the court decide?

Delay in filing appeal condoned. Status quo maintained for remaining properties not yet possessed.

FPA-PMLA-2449/CHD/2018 of Yogendra Pratap Singh v/s Joint… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2019)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1. MP-PMLA-4751/CHD/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4752/CHD/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2448/CHD/2018
Rita Singh	…	Appellant/Applicant
2. MP-PMLA-4749/CHD/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4750/CHD/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2447/CHD/2018
Arvind Kumar Singh	…	Appellant/Applicant
3. MP-PMLA-4753/CHD/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2449/CHD/2018
Yogendra Pratap Singh	…	Appellant/Applicant
4. MP-PMLA-4754/CHD/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4755/CHD/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2450/CHD/2018
Nikhil Singh	…	Appellant/Applicant
5. MP-PMLA-4756/CHD/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4757/CHD/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2451/CHD/2018
Parasnath Singh	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
Joint Director,
Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh	…	Respondents

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the appellant	: Advocate appeared
For the respondent no. 1	: Ms. Shilpi S. Satyam, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN

¶5

ORDER 07.01.2019

¶6

FPA-PMLA-2447,2448,2449,2450,2451/CHD/2018& MP-PMLA4752,4750,4752,4755,4757/CHD/2018 (COD)

¶7

Fresh appeals have been filed u/s 26 of Prevention of Money

¶8

Laundering Act, 2002 against the impugned order dated 11^th June, 2018. FPA-PMLA-2448,2447,2449,2450,2451/CHD/2018 Page 1 of 2

¶9

Alongwith the appeal an application for condonation of delay has also been filed. Heard learned counsel for both parties.

¶10

For the reasons stated in the application, the prayer is allowed and delay is condoned. Application for condonation of delay is accordingly disposed of.

¶11

Let the reply be filed in the main appeal within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder by the next date of hearing.

¶12

List these matters on 15^th March, 2019.

¶13

The learned counsel for the appellant states that possession of certain properties have been taken on 5^th January, 2019 by the Respondent after serving the notice u/s 8(4) of PMLA.

¶14

We regard to the remaining properties, status quo shall be maintained by both the parties.

¶15

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶16

New Delhi, 7^th January, 2019

¶17

‘S’

¶18

FPA-PMLA-2448,2447,2449,2450,2451/CHD/2018

¶19

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-2449/CHD/2018 of Yogendra Pratap Singh v/s Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-2449/CHD/2018 of Yogendra Pratap Singh v/s Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases