This order extends four weeks for the respondent to file a reply and retains an existing interim order in two PMLA stay/exemption appeals pending the response.
Time extended for the respondent to file reply within four weeks; interim order continues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4605/MUM/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4606/MUM/2018 (Exem.)
&
FPA-PMLA-2378/MUM/2018 Kabel Metal Power Cable Ltd.
… Appellant
MP-PMLA-4607/MUM/2018 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-2380/MUM/2018 Mrs. Chandu Jain … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Shri Gaurav Duggal, Advocate Shri M.T. Reddy, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Mohammad Faraz, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 23.01.2019
FPA-PMLA-2378 & 2380/MUM/2018
Reply has not been filed. Counsel for the respondent seeking some more time to file the reply. Let the same be done within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder by the next date.
List on 24th April, 2019.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 23rd January, 2019 ‘A’ FPA-PMLA-2378 & 2380/MUM/2018 Page 1 of 1
Kabel Metal Power Cable Ltd.
Mrs. Chandu Jain
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
