Disposed

FPA-PMLA-2374/DLI/2018 of M/s. Nanak Steels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

ATFP2 Dec 2019FPA-PMLA-2374/DLI/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Acting Chairman granted an adjournment as the last opportunity to the respondent to file a reply, deeming the right closed if not filed within four weeks, amidst changes in Investigating Officers. The matter was listed for May 19, 2020.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment granted; respondent allowed four weeks to file reply; right to file deemed closed if not filed within period.

FPA-PMLA-2374/DLI/2018 of M/s. Nanak Steels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi — ATFP (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

(1) MP- PMLA-4681/DLI/2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2374/DLI/2018

¶3

M/s. Nanak Steels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Applicants/Appellants Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent (2) FPA-PMLA-2413/DLI/2018 Mr. Ashwani Kumar Verma & Ors. … Applicants/Appellants Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent

¶4

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶5

For the appellant	: Ms. Swati Sood, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate alongwith Shri Gaurav Jain, I.O.
CORAM
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: ACTING CHAIRMAN

¶6

ORDER 02.12.2019

¶7

FPA-PMLA-2374 & 2413/DLI/2018

¶8

The learned counsel for both the parties are present. The reply is not on record. It is contended by the learned counsel for the respondent that due to change of three I.O’s in the matter the reply could not be prepared and filed inspite of last opportunity granted to the respondent. Shri Gaurav Jain, the present I.O posted two months back and it is stated by him that reply is almost ready and he will be filing the same within four

¶9

weeks. Adjournment sought by the respondent is strongly opposed by the FPA-PMLA-2374 & 2413/DLI/2018 Page 1 of 2

¶10

appellant however, in the interest of justice, one more opportunity, as a last chance, is granted. The respondent is seeking four weeks time to file the same with an advance copy to be served on the other side who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter. If the reply is not filed within four weeks, the right to file the reply is deemed to have been closed. Parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.

¶11

List on 19^th May, 2020.

¶12

Interim order to continue.

¶13

(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman

¶14

New Delhi, 2^nd December, 2019

¶15

‘D’

¶16

FPA-PMLA-2374 & 2413/DLI/2018

¶17

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-2374/DLI/2018 of M/s. Nanak Steels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-2374/DLI/2018 of M/s. Nanak Steels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases