FPA-PMLA-2365/MUM/2018 of Varsha Patel v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Varsha Patel V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-PMLA-2340/MUM/2018 | ||
|---|---|---|
| The Branch Manager Central Bank of India |
… | Appellant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-4586/MUM/2018 ( Exem.) FPA-PMLA-2363/MUM/2018 |
||
| Mahesh Narsidas Patel | … | Appellant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-4587/MUM/2018 ( Exem.) FPA-PMLA-2364/MUM/2018 |
||
| Chandrakant Narsidas Patel | … | Appellant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-4588/MUM/2018 ( Exem.) FPA-PMLA-2365/MUM/2018 |
||
| Varsha Patel | … | Appellant |
| 5. MP-PMLA-4589/MUM/2018 ( Exem.) FPA-PMLA-2366/MUM/2018 |
||
| Manisha Patel | … | Appellant |
| 6. MP-PMLA-4590/MUM/2018 ( Exem.) FPA-PMLA-2367/MUM/2018 |
||
| M/s Pushpak Bullion Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| 7. MP-PMLA-4602/MUM/2018 ( COD) FPA-PMLA-2376/MUM/2018 |
||
| Union Bank of India | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant no. 1 | : Sh. Ashishwad, Advocate Mr. Sukriti Jaggi, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Appellant nos. 3, 5, 6 | : Sh. Bakul Jain, Advocate |
| For the Appellants nos. 2&4 | : Sh. Gurpreet Singh, Advocate |
| For the Appellant no. 7 | : Sh. O.P. Gaggar, Advocate |
| For the Respondent |
: Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate |
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The Branch Manager, Central Bank of India
- appellant
Mahesh Narsidas Patel
- appellant
Chandrakant Narsidas Patel
- appellant
Varsha Patel
- appellant
Manisha Patel
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court