This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-4552/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2344/CHN/2018 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Shri P. Senthil Kumar | … | Appellant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-4553/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2345/CHN/2018 |
||
| Shri K. Murugesan | … | Appellant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-4723/CHN/2018 (A.D.) |
||
| MP-PMLA-4608/CHN/2018 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-4555/CHN/2018 (Stay) |
||
| MP-PMLA-4556/CHN/2018 (Stay) | ||
| MP-PMLA-4563/CHN/2018 (Stay) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-2347/CHN/2018 | ||
| Shri C. Rabeek Raja | … | Appellant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-4724/CHN/2018 (A.D.) | ||
| MP-PMLA-4609/CHN/2018 (E.H.) | ||
| MP-PMLA-4557/CHN/2018 (Stay) | ||
| MP-PMLA-4558/CHN/2018 (Stay) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-2348/CHN/2018 | ||
| Shri R. Yasar Arabath | … | Appellant |
| 5. MP-PMLA-4725/CHN/2018 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-4559/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4560/CHN/2018 (Stay) |
||
| FPA-PMLA-2349/CHN/2018 | ||
| Shri R. Rahuman | … | Appellant |
| 6. MP-PMLA-4726/CHN/2018 (A.D.) | ||
| MP-PMLA-4561/CHN/2018 (Stay) |
||
| MP-PMLA-4562/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2350/CHN/2018 |
||
| Shri C. Paneer Mohamed | … | Appellant |
| 7. MP-PMLA-4727/CHN/2018 (A.D.) |
||
| MP-PMLA-4564/CHN/2018 (Stay) |
||
| MP-PMLA-4565/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2351/CHN/2018 |
||
| Shri C. Anwar Ali | … | Appellant |
| 8. MP-PMLA-4728/CHN/2018 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-4566/CHN/2018 (Stay) |
||
| MP-PMLA-4567/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2352/CHN/2018 |
||
| Shri C. Raj Kapoor | … | Appellant |
| 9. MP-PMLA-4729/CHN/2018 (A.D.) | ||
| MP-PMLA-4568/CHN/2018 (Stay) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-2344 & 2345/CHN/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2347-2357 & 2392-2394/CHN/2018 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| MP-PMLA-4569/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2353/CHN/2018 Shri C. Nagoor Hanifa |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| 10. MP-PMLA-4730/CHN/2018 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-4610/CHN/2018 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-4570/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4571/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4572/CHN/2018 (Stay) & |
||
FPA-PMLA-2354/CHN/2018 |
||
| Smt. R. Kasaniya Begum | … | Appellant |
| 11. MP-PMLA-4731/CHN/2018 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-4573/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4574/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2355/CHN/2018 |
||
| Shri C. Azad Mohamed | … | Appellant |
| 12. MP-PMLA-4732/CHN/2018 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-4575/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4576/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2356/CHN/2018 |
||
| Shri K. Heeralal | … | Appellant |
| 13. MP-PMLA-4733/CHN/2018 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-4577/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4578/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2357/CHN/2018 |
||
| Smt. H. Sheela Begam @ Asma Begam | … | Appellant |
| 14. MP-PMLA-4617/CHN/2018 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-4618/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4619/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4620/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2392/CHN/2018 |
||
| M/s. R. R. Granites | … | Appellant |
| 15. MP-PMLA-4621/CHN/2018 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-4622/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4623/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4624/CHN/2018 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-2393/CHN/2018 |
||
| Shri P. Rajesekaran | … | Appellant |
| 16. MP-PMLA-4625/CHN/2018 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-4626/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4627/CHN/2018 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-2394/CHN/2018 |
||
| Shri S. Siddique Raja | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-2344 & 2345/CHN/2018, |
||
| FPA-PMLA-2347-2357/CHN/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2392-2394/CHN/2018 |
Page 2 of 3 |
Versus
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants no. 1 & 2 | : |
Mr. | A. Arockia | Raj, Adv | . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the Appellants no. 3 & 13 | : |
Mr. Mr. Cha Adv |
R. Anand Romit turvedi ocates |
Padmana Pathak, & Mr. |
bhan, Mr. Ara |
Adv. Pra vind |
wal, C. |
| For the Respondent | : | Mrs | . Shilpi S. | Satyam, | Advo | cate | |
| CORAM | |||||||
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | ACTING | CHAIRM | AN | |||
| ORDER | |||||||
| 22.10.201 | 9 |
FPA-PMLA-2347-2357 & 2392-2394/CHN/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2344 & 2345/CHN/2018
Both sides are present. It is submitted by the counsel for the respondent that due to change of concerned I.O., the direction given on the last date could not be complied. Let the same be complied and reply be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to other side who may file rejoinder
within four weeks thereafter.
List on 26th March, 2020.
Interim order to continue.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 22nd October, 2019 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-2344 & 2345/CHN/2018, FPA-PMLA-2347-2357/CHN/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2392-2394/CHN/2018
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the direction to file a reply in light of the change of Investigating Officer can be complied with within four weeks as submitted by the respondent.
Shri P. Senthil Kumar
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
