Interim appeal in prevention of money laundering matters. Procedure regarding service of rejoinder was regulated, and the appellants were allowed to file written synopses. Matter listed for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-4428/HYD/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2281/HYD/2018 |
|
|---|---|
| Sri Manoj Kumar Agarwal @ Makhariya | … Appellant/Applicant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-4429/HYD/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2282/HYD/2018 |
|
| M/s. G. S. Biotech Ltd. | … Appellant/Applicant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-4430/HYD/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2283/HYD/2018 |
|
| M/s. Mahalakshmi Natural Resources | … Appellant/Applicant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-4431/HYD/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2284/HYD/2018 |
|
| Sri Sanjay Kumar Agarwal @ Makhariya | … Appellant/Applicant |
| 5. MP-PMLA-4432/HYD/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2285/HYD/2018 |
|
| M/s. Green Field Paper Projects India | … Appellant/Applicant |
| 6. MP-PMLA-4433/HYD/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2286/HYD/2018 |
|
| M/s. G. S. Oils Ltd. | … Appellant/Applicant |
| 7. MP-PMLA-4434/HYD/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2287/HYD/2018 |
|
| M/s. Makhariya Agro Tech Pvt. Ltd. | … Appellant/Applicant |
| 8. MP-PMLA-4460/HYD/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4461/HYD/2018 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-2297/HYD/2018 |
|
| Mr. Umesh Kumar Agarwal | … Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad | … Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who | appeared |
| For the Appellant No.1-7 : Mr. |
A. Srinivas, Advocate |
| For the Appellant No.8 : Mr. |
S.V. Vanshi Krishna, Advocate |
| For the Respondent : Mr. |
Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| FPA-PMLA-2281-2287/HYD/2018 |
& FPA-PMLA-2297/HYD/2018
Page 1 of 2
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 21.02.2019
FPA-PMLA-2281-2287/HYD/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2297/HYD/2018
Counsel for the appellants states that rejoinder could not be filed
as copies of the replies have not been served. Let the same be served within three days by the respondent. Counsel for the respondent states that the copies will be handed over today itself. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks thereafter. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
List on 24th July, 2019.
The directions passed in the matters by way of order dated 10th July, 2018 in the appeals shall continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi,
21st February, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2281-2287/HYD/2018
& FPA-PMLA-2297/HYD/2018
Page 2 of 2
Sri Manoj Kumar Agarwal @ Makhariya and others
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
