Listed proceedings where appellant counsel concluded arguments and respondent was granted time to file a written synopsis. Appeal listed for respondent's arguments.
The Appeal Tribunal listed the appeal for arguments on behalf of the respondent after appellant counsel concluded submissions. The Investigating Officer agreed to produce documents on a future date and was granted ten days to file a written synopsis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP- PMLA-4702/AHD/2018 |
U.A |
|
|---|---|---|
| MP- PMLA-4387/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
FPA-PMLA-2247/AHD/2018 |
||
| Dr. Mansukhabhai Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4703/AHD/2018 |
U.A |
|
| MP- PMLA-4388/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2248/AHD/2018 | ||
| Mansukh Shah HUF | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4704/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4389/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2249/AHD/2018 | ||
| Sushilaben Mansukhbhai Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4705/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4390/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2250/AHD/2018 | ||
| Dixit Shah HUF | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4706/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4391/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2251/AHD/2018 | ||
| Dixit Mansukhbhai Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4707/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4392/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
FPA-PMLA-2252/AHD/2018 |
||
| Varsha Dixit Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4708/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4393/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2253/AHD/2018 | ||
| Purvesh Mansukh Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4709/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4394/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2254/AHD/2018 | ||
| Ruchirani Purvesh Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4710/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4395/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2255/AHD/2018 | ||
| Purvesh Shah HUF | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director |
||
| Directorate of Enforcement, A | emdabad … |
Respondent |
| FPA-PMLA-2247-2255/AHD/2018 |
Page 1 of |
Page 1 of 2
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri R.K. Handoo, Advocate Shri Aditya Chaudhary, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Mayur Joshi, I.O.
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 14.05.2019
Counsel for the appellant has concluded his arguments. As per last order, I.O. is present in person alongwith the original record. He states that all the letters dated 15th September, 2017 and one of 12th September, 2017 is available on record. He agrees to file the Photo copies of the letters alongwith the index by the next date of hearing. He will also produce the file on the next date of hearing.
Counsel for the respondent seeks 10 days time to file the written synopsis.
List the appeal for arguments on behalf of the respondent on 24th May, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 14th May, 2019 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-2247-2255/AHD/2018
Page 2 of 2
Dr. Mansukhabhai Shah et al.
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
MANMOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
