The Tribunal allowed both parties to file written synopses and directed the Investigating Officer to produce the record regarding reasons to believe and bank correspondence on the next date of hearing, listing the matter for May 14, 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP- PMLA-4702/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
|---|---|---|
| MP- PMLA-4387/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
FPA-PMLA-2247/AHD/2018 |
||
| Dr. Mansukhabhai Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4703/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4388/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
FPA-PMLA-2248/AHD/2018 |
||
| Mansukh Shah HUF | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4704/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4389/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2249/AHD/2018 | ||
| Sushilaben Mansukhbhai Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4705/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4390/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2250/AHD/2018 | ||
| Dixit Shah HUF | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4706/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4391/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2251/AHD/2018 | ||
| Dixit Mansukhbhai Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4707/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4392/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2252/AHD/2018 | ||
| Varsha Dixit Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4708/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4393/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2253/AHD/2018 | ||
| Purvesh Mansukh Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4709/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4394/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
FPA-PMLA-2254/AHD/2018 |
||
| Ruchirani Purvesh Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4710/AHD/2018 | U.A | |
| MP- PMLA-4395/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2255/AHD/2018 | ||
| Purvesh Shah HUF | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, A | hemdabad … |
Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-2247-2255/AHD/2018
Page 1 of 2
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri R.K. Handoo, Advocate Shri Aditya Chaudhary, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Mayur Joshi, I.O. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 01.04.2019
FPA-PMLA-2247-2255/AHD/2018
Ld. counsel for the appellants has made his submission for some time.
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
Mr. Mayur Joshi, I.O. is present in person. Let him produce the record from his office containing the reasons to believe as well as correspondence exchanged between respondent and concerned banks prior to the issuance of attachment order, on the next date of hearing.
List on 14th May, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 1st April, 2019 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-2247-2255/AHD/2018
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the record containing reasons to believe and correspondence with banks must be produced on the next date of hearing.
Whether the appellants are entitled to file written synopses.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Mansukhabhai Shah, Mansukh Shah HUF, Sushilaben Mansukhbhai Shah, Dixit Shah HUF, Dixit Mansukhbhai Shah, Varsha Dixit Shah, Purvesh Mansukh Shah, Ruchirani
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Justice Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
