The Appellate Tribunal noted that 90 days had expired for the respondent to file a prosecution complaint under the PML Act, 2002, as no complaint was filed by the appellant. The matter was listed for final arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
(1) FPA-PMLA-2231/DLI/2018
| Shri Kapoor Chand Galbaji Prajapati | … | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| (2) FPA-PMLA-2232/DLI/2018 | ||
| M/s. Purnima Angadia Service | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| (3) FPA-PMLA-2233/DLI/2018 | ||
| M/s. Purnima Angadia Service | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| (4) FPA-PMLA-2234/DLI/2018 | ||
| M/s. Purnima Angadia Service | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Reshabh Bajaj, Proxy counsel For the Respondent : Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 26.03.2019
FPA-PMLA-2231-2334/DLI/2018
Replies have been filed by the respondent. Counsel for the respondent states that no prosecution complaint have been filed against the
FPA-PMLA-2231-2334/DLI/2018 Page 1 of 2
appellant. 90 days period has already been expired which is the statutory period under Section 8(3)(a) of the PML Act, 2002 for filing Prosecution Complaint.
List for final arguments on 09th April, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra)
Member
New Delhi, 26th March, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2231-2334/DLI/2018 Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the statutory period for filing a prosecution complaint under Section 8(3)(a) of the PML Act has expired.
Whether the appeal is maintainable given the absence of a filed prosecution complaint.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Kapoor Chand Galbaji Prajapati
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement
M/s. Purnima Angadia Service
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
