The Acting Chairman of the Appellate Tribunal admitted the cause list for FPA-PMA No. 2225/JP/2018. The counsel for the appellant informed that no rejoinder would be filed. Parties were permitted to submit written synopsis within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-2225/JP/2018 Shri Sanjay Sethi … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Vir Inderpal Singh Sandhu, Adv. Mr. Abhimanshu Dhyani, Adv. For the Respondent (ED) : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 10.10.2019
FPA-PMLA-2225/JP/2018
The ld. counsel for both the parties are present. It is submitted by
ld. counsel for the appellant that he is not going to file the rejoinder.
Parties are allowed to file the written synopsis within six weeks with an advance copy to each other.
List on 2nd March, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 10th October, 2019 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-2225/JP/2018
Page 1 of 1
Shri Sanjay Sethi
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
