FPA-PMLA-2224/CHD/2018 of Jatinder Singh v/s The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellants sought adjournment due to counsel's unavailability. Tentative hearing fixed for 13th February 2020.
Appellants sought adjournment due to counsel's unavailability. Tentative hearing fixed for 13th February 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-PMLA-2224/CHD/2018 Jatinder Singh … Appellant
2. MP-PMLA-4398/CHD/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2256/CHD/2018 Gurnihal Singh Pirzada … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For FPA-PMLA-2224/CHD/2018 | : Shri Satish Kaushik, Proxy Counsel |
|---|---|
| For FPA-PMLA-2256/CHD/2018 | : Ms. Natasha Thakur, Proxy Counsel |
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| For the respondent no. 2 | : None |
| CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA |
: ACTING CHAIRMAN |
| 0 | ORDER 4.10.2019 |
FPA-PMLA-2224/CHD/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2256/CHD/2018
Shri Satish Kaushik, Proxy Counsel for the main counsel is present and submits that the main counsel is not available as he is out of India. Therefore, he seeks an adjournment. Reply has already been filed by the respondent. Rejoinder is yet to be filed. Let the same be filed within six weeks.
Parties are allowed to file written synopsis. No one appears for Respondent No. 2.
List the matters on 13th February, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 04th October, 2019
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-2224/CHD/2018 FPA-PMLA-2256/CHD/2018
Page 1 of 1
Jatinder Singh
Gurnihal Singh Pirzada
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court