FPA-PMLA-2205/CHD/2018 of Dinesh Kumar v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear before the tribunal on the hearing date.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear before the tribunal on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4330/CHD/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4302/CHD/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4303/CHD/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2205/CHD/2018
Dinesh Kumar … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None. For the respondent : Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate for Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 27.11.2019
FPA-PMLA-2205/CHD/2018
None for the appellant. Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate is present on behalf of Mr. Atul Tripathi, the main counsel for the respondent. It is seen from the record that neither the appellant nor any authorised representative or any advocate is appeared in this matter since many dates. It seems that the appellant is not interest in prosecuting the appeal. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 27th November, 2019
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-2205/CHD/2018
Page 1 of 1
Dinesh Kumar
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
25 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court