The Acting Chairman of the Appellate Tribunal issued an interim order directing the respondent to file prosecution complaints and written synopses with a specified timeline for commercial applications under the PMLA and FPA.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-PMLA-2163/GOA/2018
Shri Govinddas Govardhandas Daga … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, GOA 2. FPA-PMLA-2164/GOA/2018 Swarna Mimani Daga … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, GOA 3. FPA-PMLA-2165/GOA/2018 M/s. Kalash Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, GOA … Respondent Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared For the Appellant : Shri Rishi Kapoor, Advocate Shri Kartik Bhardwaj, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate 4. MP-PMLA-4241/GOA/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4242/GOA/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4243/GOA/2018 (Exem.) & FPA-PMLA-2170/GOA/2018 Mohan Agarwal … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, GOA … Respondent FPA-PMLA-2163-2165 & 2170/GOA/2018 Page 1 of 4 FPA-PMLA-2195, 2183-2188/GOA/2018
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Kumar Vaibhav, Advocate Shri S.V. Lalit, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate
5. MP-PMLA-4285/GOA/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4287GOA/2018 (Exem.) & FPA-PMLA-2195/GOA/2018 M/s. B.S. Ispat Ltd. … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, GOA … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant : | Shri Manoj Arora, Ms. Dakshaa Aror Shri Prabjot Hora, |
Advocate a, Advocate Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent : |
Shri Atul Tripathi, | Advocate |
| 6. MP-PMLA-4340/GOA/2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2183/GOA/2018 |
||
| Mst. Ishwar Sharda | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, GOA |
… | Respondent |
| 7. MP-PMLA-4342/GOA/2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2184/GOA/2018 |
||
| Shri Anand Sharda | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, GOA |
… | Respondent |
| FPA-PMLA-2163-2165 & 2170/GOA/2018 FPA-PMLA-2195, 2183-2188/GOA/2018 |
Page 2 of 4 |
8. MP-PMLA-4344/GOA/2018 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-2185/GOA/2018
Mst. Eshan Sharda … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, GOA … Respondent
| 9. MP-PMLA-4346/GOA/2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2186/GOA/2018 |
||
|---|---|---|
| M/s. Navdeep Agriculture & Properties Pvt. Ltd. |
… | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, GOA |
… | Respondent |
| 10. MP-PMLA-4348/GOA/2018 (Stay) & |
||
| FPA-PMLA-2187/GOA/2018 | ||
| Smt. Ashadevi Sarda | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, GOA |
… | Respondent |
| 11. MP-PMLA-4350/GOA/2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2188/GOA/2018 |
||
| Shri Nadkishore Sarda | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, GOA |
… | Respondent |
| FPA-PMLA-2163-2165 & 2170/GOA/2018 FPA-PMLA-2195, 2183-2188/GOA/2018 |
Page 3 of 4 |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Pradyuman Kaistha, Advocate Shri Kumar Vaibhav, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA |
: ACTING CHAIRMAN |
| ORDER 01.10.2019 |
FPA-PMLA-2163-2165 & 2170/GOA/2018, FPA-PMLA-2195, 21832188/GOA/2018
On the last date, the respondent was directed to file the copy of the prosecution complaint before this tribunal and also to supply the same to the other side within one week vide order dated 20th August, 2019. The said order has not been complied except supplying the prosecution complaint to the tribunal for perusal. Copy of the prosecution complaint is returned to the learned counsel for the respondent to file the same alongwith the copy of the same be supplied to the other side. It is also accepted by the respondent that the written synopsis is not ready and hence could not be filed. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the other side.
List on 27th January, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra)
Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 01st October, 2019.
‘D’
FPA-PMLA-2163-2165 & 2170/GOA/2018 FPA-PMLA-2195, 2183-2188/GOA/2018
Page 4 of 4
Shri Govinddas Govardhandas Daga
Swarna Mimani Daga
M/s. Kalash Mercantile Pvt. Ltd.
Mohan Agarwal
M/s. B.S. Ispat Ltd.
Mst. Ishwar Sharda
SHRI G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
