The Preventive Tribunal listed the appeals on 20th August 2019 as pleadings were complete. The Joint Director sought two weeks to verify if prosecution complaints were filed.
Applications were listed for hearing on 20th August, 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-PMLA-2163/GOA/2018 Shri Govinddas Govardhandas Daga |
… | Appellant/ Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Goa |
… | Respondent |
| 2. FPA-PMLA-2164/GOA/2018 | ||
| Swarna Mimani Daga | … | Appellant/ Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Goa |
… | Respondent |
| 3. FPA-PMLA-2165/GOA/2018 | ||
| M/s. Kalash Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/ Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Goa |
… | Respondent |
| & | ||
| 4. MP-PMLA-4241/GOA/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4242/GOA/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4243/GOA/2018 (Exem.) & FPA-PMLA-2170/GOA/2018 |
||
| Mohan Agrawal | … | Appellant/ Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Goa | … | Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Repre | sentativ | es who appeared |
|---|---|---|
| For the Appellant Nos. 1-3 | : | Mr. Rishi Kapoor, Advocate Mr. Raunak Sapthapaty, Advocate |
| Mr. Abhay Kaushik, Advocate | ||
| For the Appellant No. 4 | : |
Mr. Aditya Wadhwa, Advocate Mr. S.U. Lalit, Advocate |
| For the Respondent | : | Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| FPA-PMLA-2163-2165/GOA/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2170/GOA/2018 |
Page 1 of 2 |
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 30.07.2019
FPA-PMLA-2163-2165/GOA/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2170/GOA/2018
Pleadings are complete.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants states that the appellants are not charge-sheeted under the schedule offence. As far as PMLA complaint is concerned, counsel for the appellants states that no notice has been received by the appellants.
Mr. Atul Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to verify as to whether prosecution complaint under PMLA has been filed against the set of appellants. He seeks two weeks time in this regard.
Written synopsis has been filed in appeal no. FPA-PMLA2170/GOA/2018.
List these appeals on 20th August, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi,
30th July, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2163-2165/GOA/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2170/GOA/2018
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeals against deferred action proceedings under the PMLA should be substantively disposed of.
Govinddas Govardhandas Daga
Swarna Mimani Daga
M/s. Kalash Mercantile Pvt. Ltd.
Mohan Agrawal
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Goa
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
