The Tribunal added additional documents to the record of an appeal filed under the PMLA and then disposed of the matter by listing it for the next hearing without deciding the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4219/KOL/2018 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-4220/KOL/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4222/KOL/2018 (Exem.)
&
FPA-PMLA-2153/KOL/2018
Debasish Mitra … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Anirban & Sudippa Sarkar, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 08.02.2019
FPA-PMLA-2153/KOL/2018
Alongwith the appeal the application for additional documents has been filed. We have heard the parties. Subject to the objection of the respondent, at the final stage, the prayer is allowed. Additional documents are taken on record. MP is disposed of.
Reply in the appeal has been filed. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within
four weeks.
List on 26th March, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 8th February, 2019 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-2153/KOL/2018
Page 1 of 1
Debasish Mitra
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
