A three-filed PMLA FDR appeal was allowed, with reasons to follow, without reasons in the order text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4144/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4145/DLI/2017 (Exem.) &
FPA-PMLA-2119/DLI/2017
Smt. Neha Lohani … Appellant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Counsel appeared For the Respondent : Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
26.03.2019
FPA-PMLA-2119/DLI/2017
We have heard learned counsels for both the parties.
The appeal is allowed. Reasons to follow.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 26th March, 2019 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2119/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Smt. Neha Lohani
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Justice Manmohan Singh
Shri G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
