FPA-PMLA-2104/JP/2017 of LIC Housing Finance Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
ATFPFPA-PMLA-2104/JP/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
LIC Housing Finance Ltd. V/s The Deputy…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| (1) MP-PMLA-4094/JP/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4095/JP/2017 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2104/JP/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| LIC Housing Finance Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur |
… | Respondent |
| (2) FPA-PMLA-2062/JP/2017 |
||
Smt. Raju Devi |
… | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur |
… | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-4021/JP/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2073/JP/2017 |
||
| Shri Jai Prakash Bagarwa | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur |
… | Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-4041/JP/2017 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-2083/JP/2017 |
||
| PNB Housing Finance Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur |
… | Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who | appea | red |
| For the appellant : Shri (at 1 Shri Shri |
Panku 1.30 A. Arvind Prasha |
l Nagpal, Advocate M.) Kumar, Advocate nt Tripathi, Advocate |
| For the respondent : Shri |
Nitesh | Rana, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ME |
MBER | |
| FPA-PMLA-2104,2062,2073 & 2083/JP/2017 | Page 1 of 2 |
¶3
ORDER 06.09.2019
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
LIC Housing Finance Ltd.
- appellant
Smt. Raju Devi
- appellant
Shri Jai Prakash Bagarwa
- appellant
PNB Housing Finance Ltd.
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court