The Appellate Tribunal directed the court record to be closed as no reply was filed by the respondent and listed the matter for final arguments on 8th August, 2019. No substantive decision is rendered in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-2096/LKW/2017 Madhusudan D. Mehta & Ors. … Appellants Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : | Mr. Aditya Singh & sh. Abhaid Parikh, Advocates |
|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : | Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA |
: : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| ORDER 07.05.201 |
9 |
FPA-PMLA-2096/LKW/2017
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. Right to file the reply is
closed. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
List for final arguments on 8th August, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 7th May, 2019
‘m’’
FPA-PMLA-2096/LKW/2017
Page 1 of 1
Madhusudan D. Mehta & Ors.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
