The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Tribunal directed the applicant to file rejoinders within four weeks during proceedings FPA-PMLA-1999/JP/2017 and listed the matter for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4318/JP/2017 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-3923/JP/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1999/JP/2017
Shri Kamal Mehta & Ors. … Applicants
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Tushar Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 14.01.2019
FPA-PMLA-1999/JP/2017
Reply has been filed by the respondent. Copy has been served to
the counsel for the appellant today, who seeks time to file the rejoinders.
Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 20th May, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 14th January, 2019
‘S’
FPA-PMLA-1999/JP/2017
Page 1 of 1
Shri Kamal Mehta & Ors.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
