FPA-PMLA-1954/CHN/2017 of R. Namasivayam v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
R. Namasivayam V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-3855/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1959/CHN/2017 Shri B. Pugazhernthi … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai & Ors. … Respondents & 2. MP-PMLA-3848/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1954/CHN/2017 R. Namasivayam … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai & Ors. … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant No. 1 : Ms. Shivani Jain, Proxy counsel & Sh. Sunder Khatri, Advocate For the Appellant No. 2 : Sh. Ashish Chaudhary, Proxy Counsel & Sh. Nishad , Advocate For the Respondent No. 1 (ED) : Mr. S. K. Sharma, Advocate
CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 27.11.2019
FPA-PMLA-1959/CHN/2017
Sh. S.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent is present. Ms. Shivani, proxy counsel for the main counsel for the appellant is present and is seeking four weeks time to file the reply which is not opposed. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the other side who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
Parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sh. B. Pugazhernthi
- appellant
R. Namasivayam
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · November
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1954/CHN/2017
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court