FPA-PMLA-1942/JP/2017 of Shri Ashok Kumar v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Case brief
What is this about?
Shri Ashok Kumar V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-3829/JP/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1942/JP/2017 Shri Ashok Kumar … Appellant & 2. MP-PMLA-3830/JP/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1943/JP/2017 Shri Mahesh Nagar … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : | Dr. Shamsuddin Shams, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Tabrez Shams, Advocate Mr. Saddam, Advocate Mr. Atiqur Khan, Advocate Mr. Devesh Pandey, Advocate |
||
| For the Respondent |
: | Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate on behalf of |
| Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate | ||
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G. C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 29.05.2019
FPA-PMLA-1942/JP/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1943/JP/2017
The appeals have been filed against the impugned order dated 01st August, 2017. Learned counsel for the appellants states that the appellants are not chargesheeted in the schedule offence, no FIR is pending of any nature. No Prosecution Complaint within the meaning of Section 8(3)(a) of the PML Act has been filed within ninety days as prescribed in the Special Act.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shri Ashok Kumar
- appellant
Shri Mahesh Nagar
- respondent
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · May
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1942/JP/2017
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court