Appeals against summoning orders under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Counsel for respondent unavailable. Tribunal ordered re-notification on 21st August 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3888/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1923/BNG/2017 Mrs. Manjula Rao … Appellant MP-PMLA-3785/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1916/BNG/2017 Smt. Padmavatamma M. V. … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. Chidananda URS BG, Adv, For the respondent : Advocate appeared on behalf of Sh. N.K. Matta, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 23.05.2019
FPA-PMLA 1923& 1916/BNG/2014
Arguing counsel on behalf of the respondent is not available.
Re-notify on 21st August, 2019
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi,
23rd May, 2019
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1923 & 1916/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 1
Mrs. Manjula Rao and Smt. Padmavatamma M. V.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Justice Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
