Appellant sought extra time for filing rejoinder. Granted two weeks to file it under threat of deeming the right closed.
Two weeks time granted to the appellant to file the rejoinder as a last opportunity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1871/HYD/2017
M/s. Vaishnavi Bullion Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rohit Rathi, Proxy Advocate For the respondent : Shri Mohd. Faraz, Advocate for Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate
CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER
06.12.2019
FPA-PMLA-1871/HYD/2017
Shri Rohit Rathi, Proxy Advocate appeared on instruction from the appellant is present. He is seeking accommodation for filing the rejoinder which is strongly opposed by learned counsel for the respondent on the ground that since sufficient opportunity has already been granted to the appellant to file the rejoinder. Heard and considered. Two weeks time to the appellant to file the rejoinder as a last opportunity. If rejoinder is not filed, the right to file the rejoinder would be deemed closed.
List the case for this purpose only after two weeks. i.e. 17th December, 2019.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman New Delhi, 06th December, 2019
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1871/HYD/2017
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Vaishnavi Bullion Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
