FPA-PMLA-1859/DLI/2017 of Punjab National Bank v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Punjab National Bank V/s The Deputy…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5625/DLI/2019 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-3410/DLI/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1759/DLI/2017 Divine Infracon Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant MP-PMLA-5624/DLI/2019 (E.H.) In MP-PMLA-3906/DLI/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1986/DLI/2017 Divine Infracon Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared For the appellants : Shri Shailendra Bhardwaj, Advocate, Shri Inayat Ahmed, Advocate Ms. Rehana Ahmed, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate MP-PMLA-5530/DLI/2019 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-3637/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3639/ DLI /2017 (Exem.) & FPA-PMLA-1859/DLI/2017 Punjab National Bank … Appellant MP-PMLA-5529/DLI/2019 (E.H.) In MP-PMLA-4404/DLI/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4113/ DLI /2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3834/ DLI /2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1950/DLI/2017 Punjab National Bank … Appellant Versus FPA-PMLA-1759, 1986, 1859 & 1950/DLI/2017 Page 1 of 2
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : | Nishi Chaudhary, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Divine Infracon Pvt. Ltd.
- appellant
Punjab National Bank
- respondent
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court