Interim order allowing the appeal to continue pending receipt of rejoinder. No substantive decision on merits.
Appeal to continue. One week to serve rejoinder. Synopsis filed by both sides.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-3609/CHN/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1839/CHN/2017 |
|
|---|---|
| J. Arul | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-3611/CHN/2017 (Stay) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-1840/CHN/2017 | |
| S. Nirmala | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-3613/CHN/2017 (Stay) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-1841/CHN/2017 | |
| Smt. S. Kumari | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-3615/CHN/2017 (Stay) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-1842/CHN/2017 | |
| D. Senthil | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai | … Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : | Shri Naveen Malhotra, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate on behalf of Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : |
CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
| ORDER 13.02.201 |
9 |
FPA-PMLA-1839-1842/CHN/2017
Pleadings are complete. Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Atul Tripathi submits that rejoinder has not been received. Counsel for the appellant to serve another copy within one week. Both the parties are also allowed to file the written synopsis.
FPA-PMLA-1839-1842/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 2
List on 03rd July, 2019.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 13th February, 2019
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1839-1842/CHN/2017
Page 2 of 2
J. Arul
S. Nirmala
Smt. S. Kumari
D. Senthil
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
