Order scheduling reply and rejoinder in appeals against enhancement of use and occupation charges. No substantive decision recorded.
Petition allowed time to file reply in enhancement proceedings under PMLA. No adjudication on merits. Procedural listing only.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
(1) MP-PMLA-3554/CHN/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3555/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1816/CHN/2017 P.K.M. Selvam … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
(2) MP-PMLA-3557/CHN/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3558/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1817/CHN/2017 Smt. Poonguzhali … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Nithin Saravanan, Advocate Ms. Arunima Singh, Advocate Ms. Priya Darshini, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
29.04.2019
FPA-PMLA-1816-1817/CHN/2017
The learned Counsel for the appellant seeks some more time to file reply in the application filed by the respondent for enhancement of use and occupation charges. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the respondent who may file the rejoinder by the next date.
List on 29th July, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 29th April, 2019
‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1816-1817/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
Justice Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
