A brief appellate order where the respondent's counsel appeared but no adjudication on merits, adjournment, or specific direction is recorded in the text provided.
No substantive holding or proposition of law can be derived from this text as it contains only procedural acknowledgment of the respondent's counsel without any discussion, direction, or disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1809/DLI/2017 Atul Kumar Aggarwal … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
17.01.2019
FPA-PMLA-1809/DLI/2017
Re-notify on 24th April, 2019.
Later on Sh. Nitesh Rana, learned counsel for the respondent appeared.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi,
17th January, 2019
M
FPA-PMLA-1809/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Atul Kumar Aggarwal
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
