FPA-PMLA-1771/CHN/2017 of Tamilnad Mercantile Bankt Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
ATFPFPA-PMLA-1771/CHN/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Tamilnad Mercantile Bankt Ltd. V/s The…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, FERA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT ACTs AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. MP- PMLA-3315/CHN/2017 (STAY) MP- PMLA-3316/CHN/2017(EXP) FPA-PMLA-1712/CHN/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| M/s ARI Fabrics Limited | … | Applicant/Appellant |
| 2. MP- PMLA-3317/CHN/2017 (STAY) FPA-PMLA-1713/CHN/2017 |
||
| Thiru S.K. Karthikeyan | … | Applicant/Appellant |
| 3. FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017 | ||
| Sh. P. Velmurugan | … | Applicant/Appellant |
| 4. MP- PMLA-5533/CHN/2019 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-1744/CHN/2017 |
||
| K. Velusamy | … | Applicant/Appellant |
| 5. MP- PMLA-3463/CHN/2017 (STAY) FPA-PMLA-1771/CHN/2017 |
||
| Tamilnad Mercantile Bankt Ltd. | … | Applicant/Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai | … | Respondent |
¶3
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
¶4
| For the appellant | : | Mr. Sreenath S., Advocate Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA |
: : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| ORDER 02.07.201 |
9 |
¶5
FPA-PMLA-1712,1713,1743,1744 & 1771/CHN/2017
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
M/s ARI Fabrics Limited
- appellant
Thiru S.K. Karthikeyan
- appellant
Sh. P. Velmurugan
- appellant
K. Velusamy
- appellant
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd.
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · July
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1771/CHN/2017
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court