FPA-PMLA-1732/BNG/2017 of Sri Seetharam v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
ATFPFPA-PMLA-1732/BNG/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Sri Seetharam V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. MP-PMLA-3352/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1727/BNG/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Neelkanth Rathod | … | Appellant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-3353/BNG/2017 (Stay) |
||
| MP-PMLA-3354/BNG/2017 (Exem.) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1728/BNG/2017 | ||
| Smt. Tarabai | … | Appellant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-3355/BNG/2017 (Stay) | ||
| MP-PMLA-3356/BNG/2017 (Exem.) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1729/BNG/2017 | ||
| Smt. Sindhu | … | Appellant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-3357/BNG/2017 (Stay) | ||
| MP-PMLA-3358/BNG/2017 (Exem.) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1730/BNG/2017 | ||
| Shri Tarasingh Chittu Chavan | … | Appellant |
| 5. MP-PMLA-3359/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1731/BNG/2017 |
||
| Shri Rahul | … | Appellant |
| 6. MP-PMLA-3360/BNG/2017 (Stay) | ||
| MP-PMLA-3361/BNG/2017 (Exem.) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1732/BNG/2017 | ||
| Sri Seetharam | … | Appellant |
| 7. MP-PMLA-3362/BNG/2017 (Stay) | ||
| MP-PMLA-3363/BNG/2017 (Exem.) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1733/BNG/2017 | ||
| Shri Akashay | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore | … | Respondent |
¶3
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Neelkanth Rathod
- appellant
Smt. Tarabai
- appellant
Smt. Sindhu
- appellant
Shri Tarasingh Chittu Chavan
- appellant
Shri Rahul
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · December
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1732/BNG/2017
- Topic
- Narcotics (NDPS)
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court