The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant and respondent to examine the supplementary charge sheet, allowing time for filing the application and reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
(1) MP-PMLA-217/LKW/2011 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-173/LKW /2011
| Madhu Koda | … | Appellant/Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-341/LKW/2011 (Stay) & |
||
| FPA-PMLA-180/LKW /2011 | ||
| M/s. Quantum Powertech Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-1875/LKW/2015 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-339/LKW/2011 (Stay) & |
||
FPA-PMLA-178/LKW /2011 |
||
| Shri Vikas Kumar Sinha | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-1876/LKW/2015 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-340/LKW/2011 (Stay) & |
||
| FPA-PMLA-179/LKW /2011 | ||
| Shri Binod Kumar Sinha | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (5) MP-PMLA-1874/LKW/2015 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-222/LKW/2011 (Stay) & |
||
| FPA-PMLA-175/LKW /2011 | ||
| Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| FPA-PMLA-173, 180, 178, 179, 175 & 177/LKW/2011 | Page 1 of 2 |
Page 1 of 2
(6) MP-PMLA-338/LKW/2011 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-177/LKW /2011
Kolhan Trading Pvt. Ltd. …
Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Vinay Prakash, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate Shri A.R. Aditya, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : MEMBER |
ORDER 24.04.2019
FPA-PMLA-173, 180, 178, 179, 175 & 177/LKW/2011
The learned counsel for the appellant says that he needs some more time to file the application relating to the supplementary charge sheet filed by the ED in the Special Court. The counsel for the respondent also needs time to examine the supplementary charge sheet. Allowed. The application may be filed within three weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the respondent and, thereafter, two weeks time given to file the reply by the respondent.
List on 11th July, 2019.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 24th April, 2019 ‘D’
FPA-PMLA-173, 180, 178, 179, 175 & 177/LKW/2011
Page 2 of 2
Madhu Koda & Others
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
