Listing order in an appeal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act allowing parties to file written synopsis in the absence of counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3349/BBS/2017 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1725/BBS/2017
LUI Brail Education Society … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bhubaneswar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : No appearance (Mr. N. K. Sinha, Advocate) For the Respondent : Mr. Naveen Kr. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN ORDER 10.07.2019
FPA-PMLA-1725/BBS/2017
Counsel for the appellant states that the appellant is inclined to file the application for contempt against the respondent as despite of the statement made on 16th November, 2017. No notice under Section 8(4) was issued but the amount was withdrawn by the respondent. Let the application be filed in the registry. Mr N.K. Matta, Advocate states that he will verify the same from the respondent and file the affidavit in this regard. As far as the pleadings in the appeal are complete. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
List on 17th October, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 10th July, 2019
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1725/BBS/2017
Page 1 of 1
LUI Brail Education Society
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bhubaneswar
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
