Three stay petitions were filed against seizure orders under FEMA/PMLA. The chairperson noted the absence of written synopses and granted one more opportunity to the parties to file them.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-3207/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1667/ COCHIN /2017 |
|
|---|---|
| Rajesh K … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … |
Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-3209/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-1668/ COCHIN /2017 | |
| Vinaya R. Alva … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … |
Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-3105/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1623/ COCHIN /2017 |
|
| Pandurangabhat … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … |
Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Mohd. Faraz, Advocate on behalf of Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 29.04.2019
FPA-PMLA-1667, 1668 & 1623/COCHIN/2017
Both the parties have not filed the written synopsis. One more opportunity is granted to do the needful.
FPA-PMLA-1667, 1668 & 1623/COCHIN/2017
Page 1 of 2
Re-notify on 14th October, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 29th April, 2019
‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1667, 1668 & 1623/COCHIN/2017
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to a grant of stay on the annexed orders?
Rajesh K
Vinaya R. Alva
Pandurangabhat
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
