Appeal admitted but no appearance by appellant; appeal listed for future hearing; case disposed of via listing notice without substantive order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3012/MUM/2016 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3014/MUM/2016 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-1589/MUM/2016
Prashant Mulekar & Anr. … Appellants
Versus
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 18.10.2019
FPA-PMLA-1589/MUM/2016
No one appears on behalf of the appellant. Shri Nitesh Rana, learned counsel for the respondent is presnt. Pleadings are complete. Certain directions were given to the respondent to verify as to whether the payment of use and occupational charges are being made to the respondent or not. It is submitteed that he will take instructions and, if required, move an appropriate application in this regard.
List the appeal on 24th February, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman New Delhi, 18th October, 2019 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1589/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 1
Prashant Mulekar & Anr.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
