FPA-PMLA-1570/DLI/2016 of M/s. Bharat Communication v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
ATFPFPA-PMLA-1570/DLI/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
M/s. Bharat Communication V/s The Joint…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. MP-PMLA-2959/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1563/DLI/2016 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Manmohan Singh | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-2960/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1564/DLI/2016 |
||
| Gagandeep Singh Impex Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-2961/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1565/DLI/2016 |
||
| Gagandeep Singh | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 4. FPA-PMLA-1570/DLI/2016 | ||
| M/s. Bharat Communication | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| & | ||
| 5. FPA-PMLA-1571/DLI/2016 | ||
| Bharat Goyal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… | Respondent |
¶3
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
¶4
| For the Appellant | : | Mr. Faraz Khan, Advocate Ms. Aakriti Mathur, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : | Mr. Naveen Kumar Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA |
: : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| ORD 02.07.2 |
ER 019 |
|
| FPA-PMLA-1563-1565/DLI/2 PMLA-1571/DLI/2016 Re-notify on 3rdOctober, |
016, FPA 2019 |
-PMLA-1570/DLI/2016 & FPA- |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Manmohan Singh
- appellant
Gagandeep Singh Impex Pvt. Ltd.
- appellant
Gagandeep Singh
- appellant
M/s. Bharat Communication
- appellant
Bharat Goyal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · July
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1570/DLI/2016
- Topic
- Narcotics (NDPS)
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court