The Tribunal directed parties across multiple FEMA and PMLA appeals to file written synopsis and affidavits. Appeals were listed for future adjudication, with no substantive order passed on the merits or relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-3393/COCHIN/2018 (A.G.) MP-PMLA-3297/COCHIN/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-2966/COCHIN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1567/COCHIN/2016 Khadeeja |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| 2. MP-PMLA-2968/COCHIN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1568/COCHIN/2016 Hydrose N |
… | Appellant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-2972/COCHIN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1572/COCHIN/2016 Hassan A A |
… | Appellant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-2984/COCHIN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1580/COCHIN/2016 Sabira M |
… | Appellant |
| 5. MP-PMLA-3056/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1599/COCHIN/2017 Hameed Pandarathil |
… | Appellant |
| 6. MP-PMLA-6170/COCHIN/2019 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3058/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1600/COCHIN/2017 |
||
| Smt. Laila Siddique | … | Appellant |
| 7. MP-PMLA-3060/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1601/COCHIN/2017 Sulaikha |
… | Appellant |
| 8. MP-PMLA-3071/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1609/COCHIN/2017 Ummer Pandarathil |
… | Appellant |
| 9. MP-PMLA-3073/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1610/COCHIN/2017 Abdulla Pandarathil |
… | Appellant |
| 10. MP-PMLA-3075/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1611/COCHIN/2017 Sri Ashraf C.V. |
… | Appellant |
| 11. MP-PMLA-3077/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1612/COCHIN/2017 | ||
| Amina Pandarathil | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin |
… | Respondent |
| FPA-PMLA-1567-1568, 1572, 1580/COCHIN/2016 FPA-PMLA-1599, 1600-1601 & 1609-1612/COCHIN/2017 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant no. 1 & 2 | : | Shri K. N. Jayasankar, Advocate Shri T.T. Biju, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the Appellant no. 3 | : | Shri Naveen Malhotra, Advocate |
| For the Appellant no. 4 | : | Shri Susheel J Cyriac, Advocate |
| For the Appellant no. 5 & 7 | : | Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate |
| For the Appellant no. 6 & 8 to 11 | : | Shri K.M. Suresh Chandran, Advocate |
| For the Respondent | : | Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate Shri Shaji C, AD (PMLA) |
CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 22.10.2019
FPA-PMLA-1567-1568, 1572, /COCHIN/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1599, 16001601 & 1609-1612/COCHIN/2017
Learned counsel for both the parties are present. Learned counsel for the appellant in FPA-PMLA-1567/COCHIN/2016 stated that the writ petition bearing WP(C) No. 15342/2019 (P) has been filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam Bench in which the order dated 12.04.2019 has been challenged on several grounds. The Hon’ble Court has passed the interim order until further orders. The other appellants, against whom the said order of single Bench of this Tribunal is passed, have not challenged.
It is stated by the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the appellants against whom the further order dated 12.04.2019 has been passed have not complied the order.
On the other hand, the learned counsel for the appellants submit that since the order dated 12.04.2019 has been stayed by the Hon’ble Court, it will be applicable in respect of other appellants who are affected with the same order. Let this contentions be heard on the next date.
FPA-PMLA-1567-1568, 1572, 1580/COCHIN/2016 FPA-PMLA-1599, 1600-1601 & 1609-1612/COCHIN/2017
Page 2 of 3
Learned counsel for the respondent has filed certain clarificatory
affidavit as ordered in the last order dated 12.04.2019.
In the meantime, parties to file the written synopsis.
Interim order to continue.
FPA-PMLA-1580/COCHIN/2016
This Tribunal directed the appellant to file an affidavit. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is filing the affidavit with respect to current status of ownership of the property during the course of the day. Copy of the same has been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondent. As per the oral direction of this Tribunal, respondent has filed counter affidavit against objection filed by the appeallant in FPA-PMLA1580/COCHIN/2016.
List the appeals on 01st April, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 22nd October, 2019 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1567-1568, 1572, 1580/COCHIN/2016 FPA-PMLA-1599, 1600-1601 & 1609-1612/COCHIN/2017
Page 3 of 3
Khadeeja
Hydrose N
Hassan A A
Sabira M
Hameed Pandarathil
Laila Siddique
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
