Listing and adjournment order in two FEMA/PMLA matters directed filing of written synopses and continuation of interim order without substantive decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
(1) MP-PMLA-2884/GHY/2016 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1539/GHY/2016 Shri Charanjit Singh Gandhi … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Guwahati … Respondent
(2) MP-PMLA-2886/GHY/2016 (Exem.) MP-PMLA-2888/GHY/2016 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1540/GHY/2016
Shri Randir Singh Gandhi … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Guwahati … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Indrajeet Singh, proxy counsel for Shri Nalin Kohli, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| For the respondent no. 2 | : | Shri Premtosh Mishra, Advocate Shri Mayank Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | ACTING CHAIRMAN |
| ORDER 04.12.201 |
9 |
FPA-PMLA-1539-1540/GHY/2016
Shri Indrajeet Singh, proxy counsel for Shri Nalin Kohli, the main counsel for the appellant is present. Shri Nitesh Rana is also present for the respondent. Both the parties are directed to file the written synopsis by the next date.
List on 4th May, 2020.
The interim order passed in the matter to continue.
Shri Premtosh Mishra and Mayank Tripathi, the learned counsel for
the respondent no. 2 are present.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman New Delhi,
4th December, 2019
‘D’
FPA-PMLA-1539-1540/GHY/2016
Page 1 of 1
Shri Charanjit Singh Gandhi
Shri Randir Singh Gandhi
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Guwahati
Shri G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
