In part heard, the matter was adjourned to 2019 due to unavailability of the appellant's counsel. No substantive decision was rendered in this order.
No substantive legal proposition laid down. The appellants sought to extend time or argue against orders, but the hearing was adjourned pending the filing of paper books by the respondent and availability of the appellant's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, FERA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT ACTs AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-3663/AHD/2016 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1479/AHD/2015 (Misc.) |
|
|---|---|
MP-PMLA-53/AHD/2010 (SP) |
|
| & FPA-PMLA-122/AHD/2010 | |
Shri Nikunj Babulal Modi |
… Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1480/AHD/2015 (Misc.) |
|
| & FPA-PMLA-135/AHD/2010 |
|
| SH.Babulal Shantilal Modi | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1481/AHD/2015 (Misc.) | |
| & FPA-PMLA-136/AHD/2010 |
|
| MS Madhubala Babulal Modi | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1482/AHD/2015 (Misc.) | |
| & FPA-PMLA-137/AHD/2010 | |
| MS Hetal Nikunj Modi | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1483/AHD/2015 (Misc.) | |
| & FPA-PMLA-138/AHD/2010 | |
| Mrs. Ramilaben Govindbhai khalas | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1484/AHD/2015 (Misc.) | |
| & FPA-PMLA-139/AHD/2010 |
|
| Mr. Sandip Govindbhai Khalas | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1485/AHD/2015 (Misc.) | |
| & FPA-PMLA-140/AHD/2010 |
|
| Sh.Vijay Govindbhai Khalas | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1486/AHD/2015 (Misc.) | |
| & FPA-PMLA-141/AHD/2010 | |
| Sh. Govindbhai Narandas Khalas | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1487/AHD/2015 (Misc.) | |
| & FPA-PMLA-142/AHD/2010 | |
| Shri Nikunj Babulal Modi | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2451/AHD/2015 (Recall.) | |
| & FPA-PMLA-149/AHD/2011 | |
| Sh. Naresh Natwarlal Panchal | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2449/AHD/2015 (Recall.) | |
| & FPA-PMLA-150/AHD/2010 | |
| Smt. Roopal Naresh Panchal | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2450/AHD/2015 (Recall.) | |
& FPA-PMLA-156/AHD/2010 |
|
| Arjav Nareshbhai Panchal | … Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-146/AHD/2011 | |
| Narmadaben maneklal Panchal | … Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-147/AHD/2011 | |
| Sh Rajesh Kantilal Panchal | … Appellant |
FPA-PMLA-122, 135-142, 146-157 & 562, 269 /AHD/2010
Page 1 of 3
| FPA-PMLA-148/AHD/2011 | |
|---|---|
| Smt. Samita Rajesh Panchal | … Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-151/AHD/2011 |
|
| Sh. Deepak Jitmal Shah |
… Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-152/AHD/2011 |
|
| Smt. Pushpa Deepak Shah |
… Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-153/AHD/2011 | |
| DEEPAK JASVANTLAL PANCHAL |
… Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-154/AHD/2011 | |
| DEEVANGI DIPAKBHAI PANCHAL |
… Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-155/AHD/2011 | |
| PRAMILABEN RANCHHODLAL PANCHAL | … Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-157/AHD/2011 | |
| Ranchhodlal Nanalal Panchal | … Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-562/AHD/2011 | |
| Devangi D Panchal | … Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-269/AHD/2011 Dipak J Panchal |
… Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad | … Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. N.K. Kapadia, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 11.04.2019
FPA-PMLA-122, 135-142, 146-157 & 562, 269 /AHD/2010
Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, counsel for the respondent made his submission in part in O.C. no. 35/2009 i.e. appeals no. FPA-PMLA122,135-142/AHD/2010. He also states that he will also file the similar compilation of documents of paper books in remaining O.C. i.e. 19/2008, 36/2009 & 81/2011.
Arguing counsel on behalf of the appellant is not available due to personal difficulty and adjournment is sought.
FPA-PMLA-122, 135-142, 146-157 & 562, 269 /AHD/2010
Page 2 of 3
List this matter on 2nd May, 2019
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 11th April, 2019 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-122, 135-142, 146-157 & 562, 269 /AHD/2010
Page 3 of 3
Shri Nikunj Babulal Modi and others
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
