Two stay petitions filed under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act were listed. Respondent counsel sought a four-week extension to file a written synopsis. The matter was adjourned to 31st March, 2020. No substantive decision is rendered in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-3949/KOL/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-2724/KOL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1357/KOL/2016 Sri Suvaprasanna Bhattacharya … Appellant / Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent 2. MP-PMLA-2725/KOL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1358/KOL/2016 Jonaki Bhattacharya … Appellant / Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : Mr. |
Hiren Dasan, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. | Manoj Malhotra, Advocate | |
| Mr. Ms. |
Chand Qureshi, Advocate Krishnapriya A.R., Advocate |
|
| For the Respondent | : Mr. |
Naveen Kumar Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| SHRI G. C. MISHRA | : AC |
TING CHAIRMAN |
| ORDER | ||
| 05.11.2019 |
FPA-PMLA-1357/KOL/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1358/KOL/2016
Learned counsel for the appellants is present. The respondent is to file the written synopsis. Shri Naveen Kumar Matta, learned counsel for the respondent is seeking four weeks time to file the same. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to be served on the other side.
List on 31st March, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra)
Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 05th November, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1357/KOL/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1358/KOL/2016
Page 1 of 1
Sri Suvaprasanna Bhattacharya and Jonaki Bhattacharya
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
