The A.T. sallied a common list for remaining arguments in maintenance of assets chit the prosecution complaint and reasons to believe in PMLA cases.
This order lists multiple cases regarding Provisional Attachment Orders under the PMLA for further argument on a specified date. It also records a submission regarding the need to file a fresh affidavit disclosing the filing of the prosecution complaint and the date of removal of objection before the Special Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT Act AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-PMLA-1332/DLI/2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Naresh Jain | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| 2. FPA-PMLA-1332/DLI/2016 | ||
| Ziqitza Health Care Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| 3. MP-PMLA-3810/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3812/DLI/2017 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-1929/DLI/2017 |
||
| Ziqitza Health Care Ltd. | … Appellant |
|
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi & |
Ors. | … Respondents |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who | appea | red |
| For the Appellants : Mr. Mr. |
Anirud Abhaid |
h Sharma, Advocate Parikh, Advocate |
| For the Respondent No. 1 : Mrs Adv |
. Shilpi ocate |
Satyapriya Satyam, |
| For the Respondent no. 2 : Mr. |
A. N. Ti | wari, Advocate |
4. MP-PMLA-3813/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3815/DLI/2017 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-1930/DLI/2017 M/s. Smeta Mangal … Appellant Versus
FPA-PMLA-1929-1931/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1952/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1957/DLI/2017 & FPA-PMLA-2428/DLI/2018
Page 1 of 4
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi & Ors. … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Ms. Pooja Singh, Advocate For the Respondent No. 1 : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
5. MP-PMLA-3816/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3818/DLI/2017 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-1931/DLI/2017 Ravi Krishna … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi & Ors. … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Girish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent No. 1 : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate For the Respondent no. 2 : Mr. Siddharth Sangal, Advocate
6. MP-PMLA-3837/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3838/DLI/2017 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-1952/DLI/2017 State Bank of India … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi & Ors. … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Siddharth Sangal, Advocate For the Respondent No. 1 : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
7. FPA-PMLA-1957/DLI/2017 Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd. … Appellant
Versus
FPA-PMLA-1929-1931/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1952/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1957/DLI/2017 & FPA-PMLA-2428/DLI/2018
Page 2 of 4
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi & Ors. …
Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. A. N. Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondent No. 1 : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
8. MP-PMLA-4690/DLI/2018 (A.E.) MP-PMLA-4692/DLI/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2428/DLI/2018
State Bank of Patiala (now merged with State Bank of India) … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi & Ors. … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : Mr. Sourjya Das, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent No. 1 | : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER
02.04.2019
FPA-PMLA-1929-1931/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1952/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1957/DLI/2017 & FPA-PMLA-2428/DLI/2018
These matters have been argued on behalf of all the appellants.
Counsel for the respondent Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate states that she would be filing the copy of the prosecution complaint within two weeks. It is stated by the respondent in affidavit that the prior to passing of the provisional attachment order, no separate reasons to believe have been recorded. It is stated that reasons to believe only recorded in Provisional Attachment Order. Let the fresh affidavit be filed
FPA-PMLA-1929-1931/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1952/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1957/DLI/2017 & FPA-PMLA-2428/DLI/2018
Page 3 of 4
by the respondent to disclose the date of filing the prosecution complaint as well as the date of Removal the Objection before special court by the
next date with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellants.
List for remaining argument on 23rd April, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 2nd April, 2019
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1929-1931/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1952/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1957/DLI/2017 & FPA-PMLA-2428/DLI/2018
Page 4 of 4
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
