The Single Judge of the Appellate Tribunal, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, India, adjourned the hearing of the appeal to allow parties to file written synopses, listing the matter for the next date.
Adjournment of the appeal hearing to allow filing of written synopses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2574/AHD/2016 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1313/AHD/2016 Aman Sachdeva … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahemdabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Wattan Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 09.08.2019
FPA-PMLA-1313/AHD/2016
Counsel for the appellant is seeking an adjournment which is not
objected. Pleadings are complete. Parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
List on 17th January, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 09th August, 2019 ‘K’
Page 1 of 1
FPA-PMLA-1313/AHD/2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to an adjournment.
Aman Sachdeva
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahemdabad
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
