FPA-PMLA-1282/LKW/2016 of Sourabh Jain v/s The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
ATFPFPA-PMLA-1282/LKW/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Sourabh Jain V/s The Joint Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| MP-PMLA-2606/LKW/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1282/LKW/2016 Sourabh Jain … |
Appellant |
|---|---|
| MP-PMLA-2497/LKW/2016 (A.D) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-1279/LKW/2016 SRJ Inratech Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2546/LKW/2016 (Stay) & |
|
FPA-PMLA-1283/LKW/2016 Smt. Rajni Jain … |
Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2607/LKW/2016 (Stay) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-1284/LKW/2016 Renu Constructions Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2608/LKW/2016 (Stay) MP-PMLA-2511/LKW/2016 (Exemption) & |
|
FPA-PMLA-1285/LKW/2016 Shivali Constructions Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2609/LKW/2016 (Stay) MP-PMLA-2513/LKW/2016 (Exemption) & |
|
FPA-PMLA-1286/LKW/2016 B.A. Properties Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared | |
| For the appellants : Counsel appeare |
d |
| For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, |
Advocate |
| FPA-PMLA-1282 & 1279/LKW/2016 FPA-PMLA-1283-1286/LKW/2016 |
Page 1 of 2 |
¶3
Page 1 of 2
¶4
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Sourabh Jain
- appellant
SRJ Inratech Pvt. Ltd.
- appellant
Smt. Rajni Jain
- appellant
Renu Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
- appellant
Shivali Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · March
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1282/LKW/2016
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court