Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1243/LKW/2016 of Vivek Sudershan v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow & Ors.

ATFP7 Feb 2019FPA-PMLA-1243/LKW/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal directed appellants to file an affidavit within six weeks clarifying whether the loan amount was paid in installments or declared NPA, after conflicting submissions were received from the bank and borrower counsel.

What did the court decide?

Direction to file an affidavit within six weeks clarifying the status of the loan amount.

FPA-PMLA-1243/LKW/2016 of Vivek Sudershan v/s The Joint… — Company and Corporate | ATFP (2019)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1. MP-PMLA-2453/LKW/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1243/LKW/2016
Vivek Sudershan	… Appellant
2. MP-PMLA-2454/LKW/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1244/LKW/2016
Smt. Malvee Sudershan	… Appellant
&
3. MP-PMLA-2417/LKW/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1250/LKW/2016
Punjab National Bank	… Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow & Ors.	… Respondents

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the Appellant No. 1 & 2 : Mr. P. Ojha, Advocate For the Appellant No. 3 (PNB) : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent No. 1 (ED) : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER

¶5

ORDER 07.02.2019

¶6

FPA-PMLA-1243, 1244 & 1250/LKW/2016

¶7

Punjab National Bank has filed the copy of the statement of accounts of the borrowers on 04^th February, 2019. Copies have been served to the respondent as well as counsel appearing on behalf of the borrowers. Counsel appearing on behalf of the borrowers states that the loan amount has been paid in installment. On the other hand, the counsel appearing on behalf of the Punjab National Bank states that the loan has already been declared NPA. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that the appellant has to pay the entire amount of

¶8

FPA-PMLA-1243, 1244 & 1250/LKW/2016

¶9

Page 1 of 2

¶10

installment. He has also denied the fact that the loan has been declared

¶11

NPA. Let the Affidavit be filed within six weeks.

¶12

List on 17^th July, 2019.

¶13

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶14

(G. C. Mishra)

¶15

Member

¶16

New Delhi, 07^th February, 2019

¶17

‘AS’

¶18

FPA-PMLA-1243, 1244 & 1250/LKW/2016

¶19

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1243/LKW/2016 of Vivek Sudershan v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1243/LKW/2016 of Vivek Sudershan v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases