FPA-PMLA-1235/CHD/2016 of Sunita v/s The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Sunita V/s The Assistant Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-3126/CHD/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-2454/CHD/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1234/CHD/2016 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Satish Kumar | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh |
… | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-2455/CHD/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1235/CHD/2016 |
||
| Sunita | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Prem Chand Choudhary, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 22.04.2019
FPA-PMLA-1234-1235/CHD/2016
Copy of prosecution complaint filed by the respondent will be produced on the next date. The counsel for the appellant states that copy of the documents retained by the respondent be supplied under subsection (2) of section 21 of the Act. Mr. Rana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent is agreeable, however, he says that no doubt the appellant is entitle to receive the copy of the documents. However, he
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. Satish Kumar
- respondent
The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
- appellant
Sunita
- respondent
The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court