The Adjudicating Officer granted the Respondent two weeks time to file fresh written submissions, noting the Respondent could not take instruction based on the last order and the matter was decided on merits.
Two weeks time granted to Respondent to file fresh written submissions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-PMLA-1214/LKW/2016 Siddharth Singh … Appellant
2. FPA-PMLA-1215/LKW/2016 Brahma Prakash Singh … Appellant
3. FPA-PMLA-1216/LKW/2016 Satya Prakash Singh … Appellant
4. FPA-PMLA-1217/LKW/2016 Kamini Singh … Appellant
5. FPA-PMLA-1166/LKW/2016 Brahma Prakash singh … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Dharmendra Kumar, Chartered Accountant For the Respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
14.01.2019
FPA-PMLA-1166/LKW/2016 &FPA-PMLA-1214 to 1217/LKW/2016
Respondent has not taken the instruction in view of the last order.
He seeks two weeks time to do the needful. He submits now his client is not agreeable to the suggestion given on the last date and the matters be decided on merit. He seeks some time to file the fresh written submission.
List on 25th March, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 14th January, 2019
‘S’
FPA-PMLA-1166/LKW/2016 &FPA-PMLA-1214 to 1217/LKW/2016
Page 1 of 1
Siddharth Singh; Brahma Prakash Singh; Satya Prakash Singh; Kamini Singh
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
