The Appellate Tribunal issued a notice to appellant counsel to seek instructions from the client before the appeal could be argued. The matter was re-notified for a future hearing date.
Notice issued to appellant to obtain instructions; matter re-notified for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2024/BNG/2015 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1070/BNG/2015
Smt. Beeramma
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Syed Ahmed Saud, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
07.03.2019
FPA-PMLA-1070/BNG/2015
Learned counsel for the appellant states that he is not getting the instructions from his client. Thus, the Court notice be issued to him so that the appeal may be argued by whosoever is engaged in the matter on behalf of the appellant. Registry to take necessary step to issue notice to the appellant.
Re-notify on 30th July, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 07th March, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1070/BNG/2015 Page 1 of 1
Beeramma
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
