Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1041/HYD/2015 of Lepakshi Knowledge Hub Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad

ATFP4 Nov 2019FPA-PMLA-1041/HYD/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Five stay applications under the PMLA regarding money laundering were listed for hearing. The appellants sought an adjournment pending another matter in the Supreme Court, which was granted. The Registry was directed to trace missing written synopses.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment granted to await availability of principal counsel; Registry directed to trace written synopses.

FPA-PMLA-1041/HYD/2015 of Lepakshi Knowledge Hub Pvt. Ltd. v/s… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2019)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1. MP- PMLA-1964/HYD/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1041/HYD/2015
Lepakshi Knowledge HUB Pvt. Ltd. …	Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad …	Respondent
2. MP- PMLA-1965/HYD/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1042/HYD/2015
Lepakshi Science & Technology Pvt. Ltd. …	Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad …	Respondent
3. MP- PMLA-1966/HYD/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1043/HYD/2015
Lepakshi Heritage Wellness Village Pvt. Ltd…	Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad …	Respondent
4. MP- PMLA-1967/HYD/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1044/HYD/2015
Lepakshi Integrated Textile Park Pvt. Ltd. …	Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad …	Respondent
5. MP- PMLA-1968/HYD/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1045/HYD/2015
Asara Realty Ventures Pvt. Ltd. …	Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad …	Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appe	ared
For the Appellants : Mr. Risha	v Ambastha, Proxy counsel
On behalf	of Mr. Yogesh Raavi, Advocate
For the Respondent : Mr. Moha	mmad Faraz, Advocate
FPA-PMLA-1041-1045/HYD/2015	Page 1 of 2

¶3

Page 1 of 2

¶4

CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN

¶5

ORDER 04.11.2019

¶6

FPA-PMLA-1041-1045/HYD/2015

¶7

Shri Rishav Ambastha, Proxy counsel appearing on behalf of the main arguing counsel for the appellant is present. Shri Mohammad Faraz, learned counsel for the respondent is also present. It is requested by the proxy counsel appearing for the appellants to grant adjournment as the main counsel is busy in a part heard matter before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, which is not opposed. It is contended by the learned counsel for the respondent that he has also filed the written synopsis in the Registry but the same is not on record. Registry is directed to trace out the same and place it on record. In the event it is not traceable, learned counsel for the respondent has agreed to file another copy of the written synopsis in the Registry within four weeks.

¶8

The appellants are also directed to file the written synopsis by the next date.

¶9

List on 19^th March, 2020.

¶10

(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman

¶11

New Delhi, 04^th November, 2019

¶12

‘AS’

¶13

FPA-PMLA-1041-1045/HYD/2015

¶14

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1041/HYD/2015 of Lepakshi Knowledge Hub Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1041/HYD/2015 of Lepakshi Knowledge Hub Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases