Disposed

FPA-2/MDS/2011 of Y. Thameem Ansari v/s The Competent Authority, Chennai

ATFP4 Jul 2019FPA-2/MDS/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appellate court granted an adjournment to the appellants to submit translated Tamil documents required for reliance, directed the respondent to serve two specific documents, and listed the matter for final hearing.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment granted for submitting translated documents within two weeks; respondent directed to serve documents.

FPA-2/MDS/2011 of Y. Thameem Ansari v/s The Competent… — Writ and Judicial Review | ATFP (2019)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1. MP-224/CHN/2018 (Stay) & FPA-107/CHN/2018
Y. Thameem Ansari	… Appellant
2. MP-47/MDS/2015 (Stay) MP-8/MDS/2011 (SP) &
FPA-2/MDS/2011
Y. Thameem Ansari	… Appellant
3. MP-50/MDS/2015 (Stay) MP-9/MDS/2011 (SP) &
FPA-3/MDS/2011
K. Bairose Begum	… Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Chennai	… Respondent

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the appellants : Shri M. Abdul Nazeer, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, Joint Commissioner CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER

¶5

ORDER

¶6

04.07.2019

¶7

FPA-107/CHN/2018 & FPA-2 & 3/MDS/2011

¶8

The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted a fresh paper book alongwith a set of judgments, today in court with a copy to the respondent. He also stated that there are certain documents which are in Tamil for which he needs a short adjournment so that they could be translated into English. The learned counsel for the appellant further stated that he has not been served copies of the cross-

¶9

FPA-107/CHN/2018 FPA-2 & 3/MDS/2011

¶10

Page 1 of 2

¶11

examination/clarifications sought from the appellant by the Competent Authority on 24.03.2016 as recorded in the impugned order dated 25.07.2018. He also stated that he has not been served a copy of the report received from the Directorate of Forensic Science, Hyderabad by the respondent.

¶12

The learned representative of the respondent stated that he is ready with the arguments and there is nothing new in the documents which has been submitted today as they have already been discussed by the original authority. He also stated that he do not want to file a reply and is ready with the arguments.

¶13

Since the appellant insists on submitting the translated copy of the documents which are in Tamil and on which he insists that he would be relying upon, this request is allowed and they are directed to submit to the Registry within two weeks from today with a copy to the respondent. The respondent is also directed to serve copies of the documents at para 1 (supra) until and unless they claim confidentiality for the same for which they should give valid reasons. The learned representative for the respondent assures that these two documents will be served on the appellant within a week’s time after taking instructions from the department.

¶14

The matter may be listed for final hearing on 16^th October, 2019. No further adjournments.

¶15

(Ananya Ray) Member

¶16

New Delhi, 04^th July, 2019 ‘A’

¶17

FPA-107/CHN/2018 FPA-2 & 3/MDS/2011

¶18

Page 2 of 2

FPA-2/MDS/2011 of Y. Thameem Ansari v/s The Competent Authority, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-2/MDS/2011 of Y. Thameem Ansari v/s The Competent Authority, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases