FPA-FE-4/MUM/2016 of Shri Mukesh a. Shah v/s The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Shri Mukesh A. Shah V/s The Special…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-FE-4/MUM/2016 Shri Mukesh A. Shah |
… Appellant |
|---|---|
| 2. FPA-FE-1/MUM/2016 |
|
| Shri Ketan A. Shah | … Appellant |
| 3. FPA-FE-3/MUM/2016 | |
| M/s. Rosecut Diamonds | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Special Director, | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : Ms. Renu Narula, Proxy Counsel on behalf of Ms. Mala Goel, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Mrs. Agam Kaur, Legal Consultant |
| SHRI G. C. MISHRA | : ACTINGCHAIRMAN |
ORDER 04.10.2019
FPA-FE-4/MUM/2016, FPA-FE-1/MUM/2016 & FPA-FE-3/MUM/2016
Ms. Renu Narula, Proxy Counsel appeared for Ms. Mala Goel, Advocate for the appellant requests for an adjournment on the ground that the main counsel is busy before the Hon’ble High Court. There is no objection from the side of the respondent.
It is seen from the record that there is a huge delay in filing the appeal. It is brought to my notice that the application to condone the delay has not been filed by the appellant as yet. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mukesh A. Shah
- appellant
Ketan A. Shah
- appellant
M/s. Rosecut Diamonds
- respondent
The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court