Administrative order directing respondent to verify pre-deposit details and listing appellants for final hearing on 25 September 2019. No substantive decision recorded.
Matter listed for final hearing. Appellant to submit written synopsis. Respondent to verify pre-deposit details. No stay noted. No substantive adjudication in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-FE-707/MUM/2005 M/s. SET India (P) Ltd. |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| 2. FPA-FE-708/MUM/2005 | ||
| Shri Michael Grindon | … | Appellant |
| 3. FPA-FE-709/MUM/2005 | ||
| Shri Martha Eberts | … | Appellant |
| 4. FPA-FE-710/MUM/2005 | ||
| Shri Jayesh Parekh | … | Appellant |
| 5. FPA-FE-711/MUM/2005 | ||
| Shri George Leitner | … | Appellant |
| 6. FPA-FE-712/MUM/2005 | ||
| Shri William Pfeiffer | … | Appellant |
| 7. FPA-FE-713/MUM/2005 | ||
| Shri Raman Maroo | … | Appellant |
| 8. FPA-FE-644/MUM/2005 | ||
| Shri Michael Grindon | … | Appellant |
| 9. FPA-FE-645/MUM/2005 | ||
| M/s. Star India Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director, | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared For the Appellants : Shri U.A. Rana, Advocate Shri H. Mehta, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Aagam Kaur, Legal Consultant CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER FPA-FE-707-713/MUM/2005 Page 1 of 2 FPA-FE-644 & 645/MUM/2005
ORDER 26.03.2019
FPA-FE-707-713/MUM/2005 & FPA-FE-644 & 645/MUM/2005
Learned counsel for the appellant stated that the case is yet to come up for final hearing in the Bombay High Court and hence a long date may be given. He also submitted copies of pre-deposit which was also given to the counsel for the respondent in the court. The learned counsel for the respondent is directed to verify all these before the next date of hearing. The learned counsel for the appellant was directed to file the written synopsis of the entire case as it is a very old matter and also serve a copy of the same on the respondent before the next date of hearing. There is no stay of the High Court in FPA-FE-644/MUM/2005 & FPA-FE-645/MUM/2005
List on 25th September, 2019.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 26th March, 2019 ‘A’
FPA-FE-707-713/MUM/2005 FPA-FE-644 & 645/MUM/2005
Page 2 of 2
M/s. SET India (P) Ltd.
Michael Grindon
Martha Eberts
Jayesh Parekh
George Leitner
William Pfeiffer
Ananya Ray
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
