FPA-FE-61/MUM/2009 of Shri B. v. Adsule v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Shri B. V. Adsule V/s The Special Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-FE-56/MUM/2009 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Shri Deepak Gopal Melwani | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 2. FPA-FE-57/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri Kamlesh T. Parkekh | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 3. FPA-FE-60/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri D. D. Kulkarni | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 4. FPA-FE-61/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri B. V. Adsule | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 5. FPA-FE-63/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri Mahendera Sanklecha | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 6. FPA-FE-64/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri Sanjay Kataki | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 7. FPA-FE-69/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri Kishoire S. Nahar | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
FPA-FE-56, 57, 60, 61, 63, 64, 69, 71-73, 80, 157, 173, 226, 248, 252, 253/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-71/MUM/2010
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Deepak Gopal Melwani
- appellant
Kamlesh T. Parkekh
- appellant
D. D. Kulkarni
- appellant
B. V. Adsule
- appellant
Mahendera Sanklecha
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court